 
Subject: FZ Bible 7/9 LEVEL 1 TAPES 
Date: 1999/06/26 
Author: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net> 
   Posting History    
 
FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST
 
LEVEL 1 TAPE TRANSCRIPTS (SHSBC LECTURES) 7/9
 
**************************************************
 
Contents 
 
1 Contents + Appendix HCOPL 10 Oct 61 Problems Intensive
2 SHSBC-18  renumbered  20  22 Jun 61  Running CCHs
3 SHSBC-21  renumbered  23  27 Jun 61  CCHs-Circuits
4 SHSBC-46  renumbered  50  29 Aug 61  Basics of Auditing
5 SHSBC-64  renumbered  68  10 Oct 61  Problems Intensive
6 SHSBC-65  renumbered  69  11 Oct 61  Problems Intensive Assessment 7 SHSBC-295 renumbered 324  15 Aug 63  The Tone Arm
8 SHSpec-17 renumbered 379  21 Apr 64  Problems and Solutions
9 SHSpec-42 renumbered 405  13 Oct 64  Cycles of Action
 
Based on the modern clearsound academy cassettes plus 6 of the 8 lectures were also checked against the old pre-clearsound cassettes (omissions marked ">"). 
 
Note that two of the tapes posted by Zenon in the FPRD cassettes are also often included in level 1.  These are:
 
SHSBC-61  renumbered  65  3 Oct 61  The Prior Confusion
SHSpec-12 renumbered 374  19 Mar 64  Flattening a Process
 
Note that two of the Freedom Congress lectures are also
included in the modern level 1 academy cassettes.  We will
be doing these as part of the complete Freedom Congress
later this summer.  They are
 
FC-4  5 Jul 57 Basic Theory of CCHs
FC-15 7 Jul 57 CCH: Steps 1-4 Demo
 
A complete list of Freedom Congress, SHSBC, and all other tapes
can be found in Pilot's tape master list available at fza.org.
We recommend it for use in keeping track of tape renumbering.
 
**************************************************
 
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 
 
Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.
 
The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.
 
They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.
 
The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.
 
We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.
 
But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  
 
We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.
 
We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.
 
Thank You,
 
The FZ Bible Association
 
**************************************************
 
 
THE TONE ARM
 
A lecture given on 15 August 1963
 
SHSBC-295 renumbered 324, 15 Aug 63 The Tone Arm
 
[Based on the clearsound version only, not checked
against old reels]
 
 
Sorry for being late. What's the date? 
 
Audience: The 15th.
 
Fifteenth? 
 
Female voice: Fifteenth of August. 
 
Of what?
 
Audience: Of August, 1963.
 
Female voice: Oh, I beg your pardon, 1913. 
 
1913?
 
Female voice: AD 13. 
 
AD 13! That's a wrong date. All right. Thank you.
 
This is a lecture on the subject of the tone arm. I've been
trying to figure out how to build a meter that just had a
tone arm and I can't quite figure out how to keep it
centered. You know? It'd be an extremely elementary
meter - it'd be a very cheap meter, and we're coming down to
a point now where we actually should build up something for
a co-audit or for a Book Auditor, see - and we shouldn't
worry him with the needle. We should build him a piece of a
meter. If I could just figure out how to center a tone arm,
you know, I'd be very happy about it. I'll probably get it
licked in the next few days or ...
 
Anyway, we need just a meter - just a meter, and it would
have to give the equivalent sensitivity, here, it would
have to give the equivalent sensitivity of 16 on its tone
arm action. See, a Mark V, at sensitivity 16, for its tone
arm action and then just follow through its tone arm
action. Now preferably it ought to be able to spin all the
way. 
 
Audience: Mm-mm.
 
Not have any stop at the bottom of it. Should have the same
numbers on it exactly - should have probably a one-hand
electrode - just a one-hand electrode. And it probably
ought to have a belt clip of some kind or another, so you
could hang it on the pc with a belt or something. You could
run it on CCHs then, couldn't you? It ought to be very
rugged, and really shouldn't be any bigger than just the
area of the tone arm there - a couple of batteries in the
back of it or something like that. Have to be about the
same voltage that goes through this Mark V. You get the
idea?
 
Audience: Mm-mm.
 
Now, the reason I mention this meter to you, haven't quite
figured out how you can center it. You need something to
center so you know what the tone arm should be, see. You 
can't really have a light, it burns up too much juice. 
Maybe if you put a little - a little telltale at the
bottom of it that was a very crude meter-movement of some
kind or another and you kept that centered, and so forth,
why, maybe that would be all right. Possibly over here a
little bit to the right, maybe a little telltale there,
that had a little white center there, maybe a little black
something that you kept at the button - when it moved off
the button, why that was that, and you could get your tone
arm reads.
 
I'm trying to show you that this meter of yours can be 
subdivided to that remarkable degree, and can still be an 
extremely serviceable auditing machine. See, doesn't have 
to have any lie detection in connection with it or no 
healing adjunct or anything else - it's just whether or 
not discharge is occurring. You would see that.
 
And you realize that you could - it's impossible to run a 
GPM with no tone arm action - it's impossible, if you're getting dial-wide rocket reads, even though it returns every time,
across the dial - because you are blowing one dial width of
tone.
 
Now this shows you how much tone arm action you are actually 
getting. Here, I'll show you on this very meter, here. This 
meter's not centered well, but let's get it down here very
delicately. Now that is approximately - oh, let's be very,
very something or other - it's about 2.85, on one end of this
needle. Now let's take that needle the whole width of the
dial, and get it balanced here - just about in the test
area - and a dial-wide slash on the thing would apparently 
give us something like one-tenth of a tone arm division-up 
and down.
 
Now that's translating your needle action into tone arm action. Well, of course that is not enough. You'll still get tone arm
action, don't you see, even though just the needle is
moving, but as you've just seen, it's one-tenth of a
division. And if that's all you were getting every twenty
minutes, that is not enough. Your minimum is .25 - minimum
.25 divisions. But if the pc were running that, with
considerable elan and that sort of thing, and good perception 
and so on - you still would be blowing some charge. You
got that? Actually it's enough charge to blow a somatic.
 
Now, what's interesting is - what's interesting is, is that 
is enough for healing. Isn't that interestinle That is enough 
for healing. Some guy has got a bad foot, and you actually find
the engram - the accident where he hurt his foot, see - and 
you get needle blow-off - not tone arm - you get needle 
blow-off. You can't run tlus thing with any tone arm motion. 
You get needle blow off through this thing, and you can erase 
the somatic in his foot and he will feel much better. You will
get into this when you eventually get R3T, which I am
putting together, which might become R2T. It's the itsa
line combined with dating. And it's just the itsa line and
dating, that is all really it is - but you get into some
remarkable circumstances with that.
 
Now, that would be enough to make his foot feel all right. 
Just that tenth of a division - make his foot feel all right -
but is actually not enough to make him feel better by reason 
of auditing. See, you've got that careful delineation.
Because this was the puzzle of the Dianetic Auditor. This
used to drive the old HDA around the bend. He'd heal Aunt
Sally's arthritis, and Aunt Sally didn't believe in
Dianetics. And used to make the old HDA about blow his
brains out, see. She didn't feel any better. Well, the hell
she didn't - she used to sit there all crippled up. You -
I see this - one or two of you are thinking of cases of this.
You've had it happen, haven't you? And she isn't any
longer going gimp every time she gumps - and yet she didn't
think auditing did her any good. She had nothing much to
say about it.
 
It's a terrible lose. You get some big win - you get some 
big win from your point of view, a physiological change on 
the pc - and then so help me Pete, the pc never finds out 
about it. You got that as an example?
 
All right, this is quite fascinating. I mean you have
to - actually have to experience it to believe it. You can
get rid of somebody's warts. It's "Oh, you, oh my God,
warts, warts, warts, warts." It's all you ever heard about
was his warts, you know, and you can get rid of his warts.
Something like this happens. You see them go, man, you
know. I saw a goiter one time, go. A girl was running up
and down the Foundation hallway at Elizabeth, New Jersey,
showing off her pc and doing it fast, because the goiter
was diminishing so rapidly that it really didn't last off
the display. You say this is weird auditing - but it was -
but the goiter started to go down, and she took it around 
and showed it to various people and they could see it go 
down. In half an hour, a goiter there, which was the size 
of a cantaloupe, just disappeared into the person's throat -
just like that. Really fascinating. It's too much to say 
that woman did not ever appreciate this, but I will say that
afterwards she really didn't know about auditing. She still
had an open mind on the subject.
 
It's quite marvelous to behold. You can do some of the most
remarkable things. Now that, let me point it out, is what
drove us out of healing - not the "tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk, tsk," of the medical boys. We couldn't have cared less. But auditors in actual fact did not find it a very
satisfactory area of action. They had too many loses,
and actually we lost too many auditors. And looking back on
it, it was fairly wise to keep them from attacking the
healing profession all the time.
 
But we have just passed over, and we've told people that
they mustn't heal and all that sort of thing these days for
various reasons; it's kept them out of trouble and all that
sort of thing. There's also a technical reason back of
this - which I myself earlier was not aware of, but which I
have become aware of now, just now - is the fact that without
a complete understanding of the tone arm, it is doubtful if
an auditor will ever be able to predict whether he wins or
loses. And will therefore many times, get a tremendous
shock with the pc saying they have lost when the auditor
was sure they had won.
 
All these are very important data. They're very important
to the morale of an auditor. You see that TA sitting there
absolutely fixed, or with a tenth of a division running
through a GPM, or something stupid like this going on. You
sit there and watch that TA - absolutely fixed, sitting
there - not necessarily high, but just absolutely fixed.
There it is at 5.0, and you go on - and you audit, and you
audit, and you audit, and you audit, and it's just fixed,
right there. This is what you know. You might not know much
else in that session, but this one for sure you know: That
the pc's going to drop a curve on you at the end of the
session one way or the other, and within twenty-four hours,
is going to be subject to some sort of upset.
 
Now you really don't see this outside-the-session upset as
often as it happens. They get a little bit upset. That's
because you ordinarily pick up the person. Now, you know
that if this person is audited session after session, after
session, after session with a stuck TA, they will
eventually just start going to pieces. You maybe have seen
that. They somehow or another have been able to hold their
head up, but they're a little bit nattery. They're not
really - it doesn't encourage ARC breaks particularly, it
just isn't a nyah-nydh-nyah-nyah. They're just not doing,
you know, and so on, and they're not sure of whether they 
should be audited or not, and they don't know whether
Scientology works or not ...
 
This is the sort of a thing that you can expect from a 
no-tone-arm change, session after session after session. 
But perhaps you haven't followed through a session with 
no tone arm change, resulting in an upset of some kind or 
another in the pc's personal life within the next twenty-four 
hours. That's fascinating, see? You should take a little
cognizance of this.
 
I don't say that this is inevitable, I don't say that the 
upset is catastrophic, I don't say that anything horrible 
will happen to the person - and actually they can have bad 
luck even when they had a little tone arm action. You know, 
case in bad shape may have a little tone arm action, nothing 
to amount to anything, and they still go on having bad luck. 
All that's, all that's part of the game. But I just want to
show you that these data are tied together - the pc's
personal life and the amount of tone arm action he gets in
the session. They're tied together.
 
Now, this gives you then a prediction. You sit there and you 
watch that tone arm, no matter what you're saying, you watch 
that tone arm just sitting there or getting minimal motion, 
and the least you can expect is a sort of a cool, "I don't know" goals and gains. Well you thought the person did pretty good, you were running through something you thought did
them a lot of good, even though you weren't getting any
tone arm action. And goals and gains - well, they made some
gain - they made some gains. Minimal-minimal response -
minimal action. If you follow that through, they're liable 
to be subjected to a little bit of upset-life, in life.
 
Well, I should base this on this one thing; that you've 
actually restimulated charge, because all auditing restimulates charge. Any auditing restimulates charge, that's for sure. 
That whatsit line, as it goes across there - I am sure 
somebody out in San Bernardino or someplace is going to 
misread this or - Bloemfontein or somebody - going to 
misread that August 4 HCOB, AD 13, August 4 and they're 
going to say, "You see? An auditor that gets in a whatsit
line restimulates the pc, so you shouldn't get in a whatsit
line because that results in restimulation which gives body 
discomfort," and I can just hear this all being explained 
in some lecture. "It gives body discomfort, ARC breaks -
all the sins of auditing come from the whatsit line because 
obviously, it says right there, see, that it restimulates 
the pc, and we know that is bad." And they have it all 
explained. And therefore will refrain from ever getting 
in a whatsit line. The pcs go around the bend - sit there 
with nothing to answer, nothing to do and you think I'm 
being too snide, and cynical.
 
But don't - I know how these things backfire. I know I'll catch on to one sooner or later and 99 percent of everybody, why, 
they'll get it right down the groove, right down the groove. 
And can you imagine it, somebody a long time ago, who had been
trained here for several months, eventually revealed why
they could never complete a list - all lists had cyclic rock
slams. Rock slams, rock slams, rock slams, rock slams - so
therefore you couldn't complete the list, because it still
had rock slamming items on it. It went on and on, and on
and on, and on - and everybody just took it for granted that
this person was unable to complete a list on the person.
The pc therefore was a very unusual and extraordinary pc
and nobody ever bothered to look over the auditor's
shoulder. Because a "rock slam" was any movement of the needle - a tick, a fall, anything. Oh, some of you were 
here! I see it - nodding. Perfectly sensible auditor. I 
don't know how the dickens this was ever gotten missed. I
straightened her up in a hurry.
 
But you're going to find these things extant, No - any
auditing inevitably must restimulate. Auditing must
restimulate. In doing O/Ws on somebody, that's what makes
that a tricky process. That's what makes that a process
which is not now being pounded hard. It isn't that it
doesn't work - it's that auditors don't seem to uniformly
have good luck in restimulating the O/Ws necessary to pull
off the case. So you'll get O/W being run this way - any
Prepcheck of overts: "Well now, let's see, what have you
done?"
 
"Well I thought a nasty thought the other day."
 
"All right, that's fine. Now what was that thought? Let's
see - what - what was the nasty thought? Here's the What
question: What was the nasty thought? Who was it about?"
 
"Joe."
 
"All right, what was the nasty thought about Joe? That's
basic, all right that's fine. All right, let's get another
nasty thought about Joe - is there any earlier nasty thought
about that?"
 
"Well yesterday I thought a nasty thought about him too -
yesterday."
 
"All right. We got yesterday's, now we got today. Good.
Tell me all about the nasty thought, now. All right, that's
fine. You - you thought - you thought he wasn't as tall as 
he should be. All right, that's good."
 
See, we're really making headway on this pc, we're picking
up all of his overts.
 
You say, "It's the pc's fault," you see-they blame it on the pc, and say well the pc just isn't coming up with his
overts. No, no, no, no, no. The auditor - the auditor just
is never restimulating his overts. One of the favorite
methods of restimulating somebody's overts, if not the best
one - it's still one that was very commonly used by somebody
who has great success with that type of Prepchecking - is:
"What have you done? No, not now what have you thought - what have you done to Joe? Done, you know? Done, done, done.
What have you done to Joe? Done, you know? To Joe. Done."
It's what is known as impingement, see.
 
And the pc, 'Aaaahhhh! Stole his lunch one day." 
 
"Ah, good."
 
That's in the realm of restimulation. So any type of auditing 
which requires extraordinary targeting and restimulation, 
becomes more difficult to do. The more difficult auditing 
is the significances of restimulation which the auditor must 
engage in with the pc. Now the degree of the restimulation 
restimulated in the significance, becomes even a greater level 
of skill. That's really smooth.  How much GPM are you going 
to restimulate to get the GPM run? The very smooth auditor 
restimulates just exactly the items which he wants to 
restimulate in the GPM and gets them blown.
 
Now as the skill deteriorates, the greater the number of
items are restimulated by the auditor, the greater the
number of GPMs restimulated by the auditor to get one
GPM - until you'll eventually get some auditor who has sixty
or seventy GPMs restimulated with half the items in each
one in high level of restimulation, in order to get one
pair of items.
 
This sounds like an exaggeration, but it almost isn't. You
get the amount of skill? Well, this is the regulation of
restimulation. That's your whatsit line. And the only thing
that's called for on the whatsit line is have a heart. See?
Know what you're going for, know what you've got to get to
and have a heart! Take it easy! See, that's the thing.
Let's go for the, engram necessary, you know, to be run at
this particular time in R3R - let's go for this thing and
let's run it. And let's restimulate and run as much of it
as the pc can handle.
 
Let's don't restimulate the whole chain in order to get one 
engram slightly run, see. You could actually hunt and punch 
around. Q and A helps to mess it up, you see? "Well, no, I got this, I got this, this incident here. It's got a - it's 
got an airplane in it, and it seems to be diving - diving 
at the ground."
 
"Oh. Oh, all right. Okay. Any earlier incidents there of 
airplanes diving at the ground, and so on?"
 
"Well, yeah, yeah, here's another airplane diving..."
 
"Good, good. Any - well, give me the - give me the earliest - give me the earliest - the earliest incident of airplanes 
diving at the ground."
 
"Yeah, well here's a whole bunch of airplanes diving at the ground. Here's a lot of incidents of airplanes diving at the
ground, uh - so on. Seems to be able to get to me - I feel 
very funny as a matter of fact, I'm not quite sure..."
 
It's the use of that word "earliest" and getting engram after engram after engram, without running any engrams. Get the idea? I mean when you finally - when you finally get through with
this poor pc, you overrestimulated. You haven't permitted
him yet, technically, by running things, or listening to
his itsa line or anything else - haven't permitted any of
the - of the charge to come off of the incidents he had
available. Next thing you know, why he's got so many
incidents available, that they're sitting in one place, and
the bank's so charged up that it looks like a live bomb. So
does the pe. He's getting very hard to handle, and so
forth. Restimulation is inevitable. The very tools of the
trade in the auditing session result in restimulation.
 
Now auditing works because of restimulation and the blowing 
of that charge. And it's a cycle. You restimulate and you 
get the charge off and you restimulate and you get the charge 
off and you restimulate and you get the charge off and you
restimulate and get the charge off, you restimulate ...
That's all that auditing is - there's no more than that!
 
Now, of course the odd part of it is, that you don't have to 
personally sit on top of the charge which is being blown off, 
so therefore you can blow an early charge on any chain - 
blow an early charge on any chain of incidents, without the 
rest of it being particularly in restimulation - and you'll 
get the charge blowing off the rest of it out there a light-year away, and it all kind of starts shattering and going to pieces 
and dropping apart. And you don't see it particularly register 
on the meter. This is what marks faster auditing. See, it's 
getting the charge, which triggers off charge. That is what 
regulates it. But, that's merely faster. That's the only 
thing that does.
 
But, whether it is charge restimulated in present time, or
charge restimulated ten years ago, or charge restimulated 
ten umpty-bumpty trillions, it is nevertheless charge - and
it's going to be restimulated on the whatsit line. Now, if
you don't put in the itsa line, and let the charge come off
that is restimulated, then the pc gets too much of it
banked up - pardon the pun - and he just more or less drowns 
in this stuff. And he doesn't know whether he's coming or
going after a while. He doesn't know who his auditor is,
and so forth, he ARC - he's ARC broken with somebody on the
track and he ARC breaks with the auditor and bypasses
charge, and he dramatizes and all that sort of thing. This
is strictly because he's overwhelmed.
 
It's: How much charge do you restimulate? Now, I've shown 
you two examples - restimulating too much charge and 
restimulating too little charge. And they're equally errors. 
Because in the first place, restimulating too much charge, 
eventually no auditing gets done - and restimulating too 
little charge, no auditing gets done and they're both sins. 
It's not necessarily true that the person who restimulates 
too little charge is more virtuous than the person who 
restimulates too much charge. In fact I would say, he's the 
real sinner. Because at least this pc sometime or another 
may be able to sit down with some body who will listen to him, 
and get off the charge he has now become aware of See, that 
possibility exists. So the real sin is not restimulating any 
charge.
 
And you'll find somebody who pulls off from running an
engram because the pc hurt too much. Well, I don't think
that has anything to do with auditing. I never heard that
influence an auditing session before. So he hurt too
much - what's that got to do with it? What auditing are we
dealing with here? No auditing I ever heard of. Pc hurt too
much. What's that got to do with it? I don't understand.
You mean you ended the session because the pc hurt too
much? You can kill more pcs that way. Pc's saying, "Ow - 
ow - oh, it's terrible! Oh - it's terrible!"
 
You say, "All right, well, it's too terrible, we won't 
finish running it."
 
And you want to see somebody in terrible condition, man!
That pc is now in terrible condition! You just bypass the
rest of the pain right there, you see. Lock it all up and
boom! I'd go so far as to say that earlier on the track
when they're in good shape, thetans enjoy pain. If you
don't believe it, sometime tell somebody "Waste some pain,
thank you. Waste some pain, thank you. Waste some pain,
thank you. Waste some pain, thank you. Waste some pain,
thank you."
 
You'll see him all of a sudden get this haunting idea. "Go
ahead. Get the idea of wasting some pain. Good. Waste some
pain. Good. Waste some pain...  He looks at you, "You know, I like this stuff." It's very remarkable. Sadism is not 
peculiar. Sadism is a lower harmonic of an actual fact. 
Any sensation is better than no sensation and anything is 
better than nothing.
 
Now, that's different from only being able to enjoy pain.
That speaks of a very low-scale character. But pain
ordinarily didn't bother you at one time or another. I can
see you now, putting your - putting a beam into power line
insulators for kicks. You know, wondering how much zing
you'll get out of it. "Hey, Joe, come over here. I think I
found one that's a couple of hundred thousand volts." "That stuff over there, that's only ten thousand."
 
Well, just look at your Effect Scale, you realize that as a
thetan goes up scale he can stand more effect. He can feel
in different ways about the same effect, too. This has
nothing to do with it then. That's a particularity of 
sensation or a particularity of reaction. An auditor really
doesn't have anything to do with the particularities of
action. You can't say that actions are bad actions or good
actions, as far as what the pc is going through. You can
only say, is his mind on his case or not on his case? If he
conceives all the bad actions taking place in his
environment, he for sure has an ARC break, i.e., newspaper
reporters, and so forth. They're ARC broken someplace or
another - to such a degree, that they're practically
psychotic. And they can only see the environment, you see.
They can't get interested in their own case. Therefore,
they violate the basic definition of auditing and they're
therefore unauditable. Most newspaper reporters are
unauditable.
 
Scientologists have every once in a while tried - l'm not
starting on the subject of news, but there just happens to
be a breed of cat - and he has a hard time, because he's
running up social overts all the time and he eventually
gets a tremendous amount of missed withholds. "Now, Joe,
I'd like to write this story about you, Joe, and we're
really going to write a good story about you, Joe." And
police think that Joe has murdered his wife, see, and he's
just trying to get some hot dope. Joe sees the story on the
headlines, "Murder Suspect in Love Nest Slaying." See, his overt is creating a fantastic ARC break, see. The guy told 
him something in confidence, and he went and wrote it in 
some other way, don't you see. He gets caught in this all 
the time and he eventually with this piled-up series of 
overts, he starts dramatizing it. So there he is - he's 
just caught and it - everybody talks to him, missed withhold, 
missed withhold, missed withhold, missed withhold, don't 
you see? Overt is create the ARC break - betray, betray, 
betray. Missed withhold - betray, missed withhold - betray. 
Next thing you know, there he is. See, total ARC break 
with the entire environment.
 
I'm just giving some - just that as an example of somebody 
who gets chronically in this condition. And you can put 
your pc in exactly that condition - not because of overts 
or withholds particularly - but by just taking a great big 
slug of restimulated charge, letting the pc not get hold of 
very much of it, restimulate it pretty well out of his sight,
you see - and then drop a nice iron curtain down in front of
the charge. And boy, that charge glances off that nonexistent 
itsa line, and goes right back on the pc - kapow! It's just 
like short-circuiting things.
 
You could even - you could even dream up an electrical circuit 
that would do this - it'd be quite factual. Dream up an 
electrical circuit so that this condenser over here, and 
so forth, could build and build and build, and then the line 
this condenser is supposed to bleed, over here and the charge
dissipate. And then get a knife-edge or something that
crosses that line, to block that dissipation line, don't
you see, and get the charge so that it's rerouted back
to a bulb we will call the pc - and boy, let me assure you 
that bulb will light up, see. Or you could even have a little 
neon circle around the pc called "restimulation," a red neon tube around this bulb, and boy, you would not see the pc 
light up, you would see the tube light up, and even that 
would be more graphic. The pc goes out and the tube lights 
up, don't you see? You could make all sorts of graphic 
representations of this that would demonstrate it, because 
it's as crudely demonstrable as that. I'm not talking 
allegorically. There's no allegory mixed up in it at all, 
it's just fact.
 
Auditor says, "Da-da, da-da. Da."
 
And pc says, "Hm-mmm."
 
"Well, all right, thank you." In the multitudinous ways he can cut the line. And the auditor says, "Da-da-da-da-da-da. Da." 
 
And the pc says, "Well uhm - actually ..."
 
"Well, sss - its - doesn't read on the meter here. Don't bother to answer that. Very good. Da-da-da-da-da-da-da. Da" - Bow! 
 
And you can practically hear the electrodes connect, finally, 
in the pc's skull. Bzz-zzzz-zzzz! Pc goes out of control and 
is no longer capable of self-control because all of his control
mechanisms are shot - they're short-circuited with charge.
After all, he controls his body, his voice, his thinkingness 
and so forth, with neuron-directed currents, as long as he's 
in a body. And the second these things get too charged up, 
why any action that is there to be duplicated in terms of a 
dramatization, will of course get duplicated. And he then 
cannot get through this charge in order to assert control 
of his voice, his limbs or otherwise. He sort of sits back 
himself in total amazement at watching himself in this ARC 
break, and also totally incapable of halting it until you 
finally identify, locate and indicate that charge. And the 
second you locate and indicate the charge, you have dissipated 
it to that degree, that the person all of a sudden says, "Phewf!" and you've given him back his controls.
 
It'd be the same as taking the pilot out of the cockpit of
the airplane and throwing him back halfway down the
fuselage. Meantime having thrown enough tanglefoot into the
cockpit that it'd short circuit all of the various
instruments, controls and so forth. Naturally the plane
will go into a spin. it s as elementary as that, it's not
any graphical or allegorical or odd thing, I mean - it's
sitting right there in front of you. You can look at it
straight in the eye and see it happen.
 
Now reversely - reversely, we don't give the session any fuel
to run on. Don't let any current run in the lines at all - no
current at all. That'll be the end of that session. "Is it
all right with you if I start this session now? All right.
You sure there isn't something you want to say? Oh, you're
not - not saying anything, all right. It is all right if I
start the session now, isn't it? All right, well, here
goes. Start of session. All right, very good, okay, we're
going to run some sort of a process here, but you just feel
free to tell me anything you want to tell me. Now what - what
do you want to tell me? You haven't got anything to say
much, huh? Well I don't have much to say either. All right.
Well, maybe we can put two-and-a-half hours in here without
getting into trouble. Seen any pictures lately - no, that's 
a pretty dangerous subject. Let's talk about books, huh?
Let's talk about books we haven't read. How's that?"
 
Well of course - of course it's a no-auditing situation. Your
pc by the way will get just as upset on a dry run. Why?
Because he keeps trying to find something, he keeps trying
to find something to talk about, and he hasn't got anything
to talk about, and you're now however running an electrical
circuit with no current at all.
 
Eventually, running it with no current at all, you run it
dry and it sort of takes on a sponge-like characteristic.
And the condenser will start picking up charge, whether you
want it to or not. Simply out of the intention that
auditing is going to occur. And this no-current circuit
will gradually bleed some charge out of the bank, in spite
of the auditor, in spite of the pc, it is still mis-charge
and the pc will still explode. You can't win. The only
thing you can do is to restimulate the amount of charge
necessary to keep the session going. And that's how much 
charge you restimulate. See that? That's how much charge 
you restimulate. You make it as basic and as fundamental 
and as significant as possible - but you don't keep going 
for charge and charge and charge and charge, leaving charge
unblown - becuase you're eventually going to swamp your pc, 
no matter how tough he seems, you still will swamp the pc.
 
Now, this tone arm is the instrument which measures the
adequacy of restimulation. That shows you that an adequate
amount of charge is being restimulated in the session and
that it is being adequately dispelled on the itsa line. And
this shows you that the cycle of whatsit-itsa is in
progress, and the amount of restimulation is adequate to
get auditing done.
 
Now the funny part of it is, that it's absolutely miles of
margin. You would say - you look at some pcs that have a
fragile, delicate tone arm, and you won't think there's
this much margin - but in actual fact, on the usual pc
there's just really miles of margin. You can overrestimulate 
and still get tone arm action, you actually underrestimulate 
and get some tone arm action. In other words this is a high 
level of tolerance. The tolerance is tremendously high. 
That's perhaps a happy thing, but it doesn't give you a 
split hairline estimation. You can have the pc pretty well 
swamped and still be getting tone arm action - you can be 
running the pc too shallowly and still be getting adequate 
tone arm action, see? So there's a lot of tolerance in this. 
It isn't anything that you have to measure very precisely.
Most auditors, therefore, groove into the situation that 
they get tone arm action, then they don't worry about too 
much restimulation or too little restimulation.
 
Now if you get too much restimulation, you get an inevitable 
cessation of tone arm action. If you get too little restimulation, you get an inevitable cessation of tone arm action. The
result is the same for both conditions. There is nothing in
the meter that tells you you're getting too little or too
much. But the mechanics of auditing, all by themselves; any
valid auditing question, that gives tone arm action, is
restimulating enough charge to cause auditing to occur. So
auditing itself prevents to a marked degree the lower, too
little restimulation from occurring, if it is done.
 
For instance, if you're doing anything and getting tone arm 
action, you probably are at the minimal. Now, that's also -
you're told by the amount of significance which you are 
auditing. You're auditing, let us say, GPMS, man. And you're 
piling it on, hot and heavy. Well, let me tell you, at no time
during that session are you going to have too little tone
arm - too little charge. At no time are you going to have too
little charge. You're fooling with stuff - you're fooling
with stuff that obviously is going to give charge - heavy
engrams, heavy GPMS, backtrack stuff, all this sort of
thing. That is all capable of furnishing Niagaras of
charge - and just ticked will furnish a Niagara of charge.
 
So when you're using upper-level processes - when you're using 
upper-level processes - the only error that you pay any 
attention at all to is too much charge being restimulated. 
And that's the only area you pay any attention to. You're 
sitting there throwing the GPMs at him and that sort of thing.
 
Well, you're sitting there pushing items at him. All right, 
you're running a chain of engrams. All right - fine, fine, fine. There's certainly available. Niagaras of charge. So on higher-level processes you only have the "too much charge" error. On high-level processes you only have "too much charge" as an error - and that's the only thing that halts the tone arm 
action. You actually can't err in the direction of minimal charge. Because if you just stopped running the GPM the guy would start - and let the itsa line in - the guy would start drifting up 
through the locks, telling you about locks and that sort of
thing. It'd be impossible for him to remain static in the bank, in the vicinity of this much living lightning, don't you see? You can't make the minimal TA error in running high artillery.
 
Build an atom bomb or build an atom bomb that doesn't explode 
enough. You see, it can't be done. That's the whole trouble. 
You take the Savannah - that atomic ship that they built and
these submarines. They've done a pretty good job on the
submarines, on that atomic ship, and so forth. Their
trouble, all this atomic design - the trouble is just too
much heat. There's too much horsepower. They can't get rid
of it. There's enough there to run the ship and to warm all
the water around the ship and cook all the fish for
half-a-dozen fathoms down below the keel and they still
can't get rid of the stuff, you see - there's just too much
power. And that is your problem in auditing high-level
processes.
 
This is one thing for you to know, man - in spite of the fact 
that you don't think the pc is getting much contact with it, 
because you aren't getting tone arm action. You've got him 
running through any GPM, and you're not getting tone arm action - let me tell you that it is never too little charge. See? Now
you get this pc going through the incident and you're not
getting tone arm action and you're just getting a flash. In
some Central Organization recently they were - no tone arm 
action - no tone arm action, and half-inch rocket reads
choked, was considered adequate to run a GPM. And everybody
was walking around looking like corpses. Fortunately the
Assoc Sec landed in time. Grim!
 
All right, now what's this condition? What's this condition
all about? Too much charge. Pc shuts it down. Tone arm
locks up - no tone arm action. Can't be any such thing as
minimal charge, you see? You say, well, it's beyond the
reality of the pc. Well, you've explained it in a dozen
different ways. I don't care how you explain it. It's just
too much charge. Because unreality equals force and
invalidation. If you want to know what unreality is, it's
force and invalidation. You can add on the thought level,
disagreement. Force, invalidation. Invalidation slightly
on the thought level too. Uncoordinated force - raw force.
That sort of thing. That's unreality. So that person to
whom things are the least real is that person swamped by
the most charge. Your problem in such a case is how do you
bleed it off - not how do you restimulate it. How can you
open up a line to decondense the condenser - that's the
problem, not how do you restimulate charge. Life's done
that for you adequately and the pc has cooperated gorgeously 
- and the pcs got themselves in a charged up state that 
they're like living lightning. They're swamped all the
time. Don't feel good, this, that, the other thing - all
these various body conditions, sort of ARC breaky with
life, and so forth. There's just too much charge.
 
The auditor - the auditor has to be a skilled wirelayer, to
attach the discharge line, with sufficient delicacy that
it won't blow all at once because the pc would simply
explode into an ARC break or something. So you've got to
bleed it off very carefully. Now what do you - what do you
put the lead to? What do you put the whatsit line to? How
do you tap this thing? That's the big problem. Look, you
could sit there and say, "Well, do you have any GPMs in
restimulation? Well let's run a GPM." This person's tone
arm was never known to move from 6.5, or from 1.0, see.
"Oh, let's run a GPM." Oh, great. Oh, man. It's like
emptying the Pacific Ocean into the Atlantic Ocean because
the Atlantic Ocean doesn't have enough water in it or
something. See? And after you've emptied the Pacific Ocean
into the Atlantic Ocean, why, you're going to find the
Atlantic Ocean is now too full. Thafs for sure. People are
going to be wearing rubber boots in New York, that's for
sure!
 
But let's look at this then. Then it is not a problem of
emptying the Atlantic Ocean at all, to one of these fragile
tone arms - pardon me, not throwing more charge in there at
all. It's not even a problem of emptying it. It's a problem
of how do you get a few drops out of it. You know? The few
drops that the pc's knowingness and reality will carry as a
channel. You'll find such people very often beg you for a
one-shot Clear process, you know? They actually sell this
so hard they probably create psychiatry. Create these
heroic methods, see. The old Effect Scale is in process
here, see. To these people, you say, "Did you ever solve
any problems? You ever - you ever think about anything? Would
you like to tell me about it?"
 
"Well, yes, yes.. ."
 
They don't know if it's safe, see, and you'll see them clam
up a lot, and not talk a lot and go into large pauses and
all of this kind of thing, don't you see. But gradually
you'll all of a sudden see your tone arm move. See, you've
opened up a safe charge-bleeding line. They're not
suspicious of it; they're not worried about it. They know
nobody can handle this stuff, see. They - that's what they
know. That's the biggest knowingness there is. They got the
idea they're, they're just delicate, that if they think the
wrong thought they're going to go nuts. See, they're in a -
they're careful. They're careful all the time. They must 
think pure thoughts. "If I walk this tightwire called life, exactly right, I don't know, maybe I - maybe I'd better not 
walk it today. Tomorrow - tomorrow, that'd be - that'd be 
best. We'll start tomorrow. Whoooo! I almost stepped on the 
thing," see. Everything is a live wire.
 
The Scientologist who's had quite a bit of auditing, 
particularly you guys, you'd make me laugh at you if you told 
me you felt like you were going mad, or something like this. 
I frankly would just laugh in your face. I wouldn't put the 
itsa line in at all. I'd laugh. Because frankly, you couldn't 
possibly make it. Once in a while, after a session has blown 
your brains out or something of the sort, you might feel like 
sobbing and crying to yourself quietly, but you'd still know 
you're going to come out of it.
 
Well that isn't how this character who's never had any charge 
bled off at all feels, man. That is the carefulness created 
in psychotherapy of past ages. That is the general philosophy
of such people's lives, if they're just cautious; if
they - if they just aren't adventurous in any way, they
somehow or another, will get through. Well, what are they - 
what are they doing'.? They're just - they know they're
living on a bomb, and they're afraid to connect it up to
anything, so they're afraid to say anything to anybody, or
anything like that. I know one pc up in London - finally we
found out he'd been collecting all the blackness in the
universe - all the blackness in the universe, to keep other
people from having to suffer from it. That was his final
act of kindness. And this guy - this guy looked like an
animated corpse, complete with - complete with formaldehyde 
scar, you know? This was a bird, man! He was a gone dog.
 
Now you run any pc too high grade, pick up too little charge 
on the backtrack, you keep him looking bad while he's getting
better. Let's get into another ramification of this. You
might even deteriorate the condition of his body while he's
getting better. There's no particular reason making him
look pretty, but the point - the point I'm making here is
that you actually can run him too steep by far for his body
tolerance, and still get tone arm action. But when you
exceed that - when you exceed that, your tone arm action will
cease. This is all on the subject of charge and nothing
else.
 
Well all of this is very, very interesting but what do you do? 
What do you do? And what actually has happened here? And how 
did somebody get that charged up? Somebody comes off the
street, never had any auditing, never studied any books - no
reason for all this charge to exist. You realize by cognition 
alone they read books and get charge off one way or the other. 
We discharge a lot of things that we never see on an E-Meter -
tremendous quantity of it.
 
Oh, there've been a lot of cases of birds lying in bed sick, 
they read something like Dianetics: Evolution of a Science, 
something like that - and been in the hospital for Lord knows 
when, the doctors are about to operate and they say "to hell with them," and get up and get on their clothes and go out and never been sick since, you know. Weird things like this
have happened. Well, that was a showing that there was a
link existed for the charge, and some must have blown at
that particular moment and brought the case to an
equilibrium. So it knocked out the psychosomatic illness.
Anybody with psychosomatic illness is simply suffering from
too much restimulated charge that he doesn't know what it
is or how to get rid of it or anything else.
 
If you ever want to meet a nasty character, meet somebody -
I mean a nasty-tempered character - meet somebody with cancer.
They're uniformly nasty tempered. Well how much - they're in
an almost total continuous ARC break. Just fabulous - ARC 
break going on all the time. Certain particular types of 
cancer are worse than others.
 
Arthritis - arthritis is a case in point. Arthritics,
raaooow! See. Well, what is all that stuff gathered up on
the bones and binging into the cells, an all of this sort 
of thing? Well, this isn't any esoteric charge, like poor 
old Wilhelm Reich. What was it he had? - orazone or something.
The FDA killed him you know, just as sure as they stood him
up in the street and shot him down with a gun. And he was
never arrested for anything he ever did. They faked him a
contempt of court charge, you know, and threw him in
prison, and the old man was already an escapee from Hitler
and he just went into pure terror and died. The good old
FDA.
 
Anyhow, poor old Wilhelm Reich, he was always talking about
this stuff that was drifting all over everything. You
understand - he was talking about charge. You find old Jung.
He's always talking about some kind of mysterious influence
in his vicinity. You know, stuff broke around him. You know
he never attributed it to himself? It's very remarkable,
but stuff - everything was breaking and snapping. He and
Freud were in a room one day and a whole bookcase split
down the back. Just fantastic things going on around him.
He never - he never said for a moment, or he never thought
for a moment that it was himself, see.
 
These guys are actually dealing with force. Forces of one
kind or another. Well I don't care whether we measure them
like poor old Reich, and call them by an odd name or
measure them and not know anything about them at all
except note their effect as in Jung's case, or wherever we
look we see the evidence of what we're talking about and
calling charge.
 
This guy is going this way down the street, see, all the
time. Well what's holding his hand like that? He wouldn't
be holding his hand like that, man. There's something
holding his hand like that. All right, call that charge. 
He's - here's somebody else - here's somebody else and he's 
got himself a neck - hurts him, all the time, all the time, 
all the time, all the time. Well, we isolate it down; we find
out after a while it's a pole trap, or it's something like 
that or somebody't stuck in a GPM, or something like this
has happened to him - that's what gives him the somatic. But
that's the particularity of the charge, giving its time and
date location and so forth. It is simply just charge. And
it is in restimulation, so it chews the devil out of him.
 
Sometimes you notice right after a session you've got
somatics. And you walk away from a session and they vanish.
Well, it's a case of momentary restimulation. Other times
you walk out of a session, you have an awful somatic and it
doesn't vanish. And the next day you're still feeling
foggy. And two or three days later you're not foggy
anymore. Well that is the period of destimulation of
charge. Usually from three to ten days. Now of course if
you continuously stimulate charge and continuously
stimulate it, continuously stimulate it and never pick it
up, give it no way to bleed off or anything like that, it
becomes chronic charge. And that is what happens in life.
You get a restimulation of charge and it becomes chronic.
 
Now actually, you have to enturbulate a thetan pretty badly
to put him in a condition where he can get chronic charge.
You have to give him an implant every twenty-five, thirty,
forty, fifty, sixty, seventy years. You have to hit him
hard - and sometimes even then you don't hit him hard enough.
I know, they're probably being critical right now on the
subject of, "They've got to step up the megatrons in the
between-life area - those damn Scientologists coming through
here, blowing out all the fuses. Rewire the place." Make
you feel creepy? Well it shouldn't make you feel creepy, 
they wouldn't do anything for you. I don't think they're 
that energetic anymore.
 
They're dependent upon a system. So they've got to charge 
up your bank and charge you up, and so forth, so that you 
can get charged up and be uncomfortable enough to consider 
yourself entrapped. I just ran into - while they prepare 
you for the series of implants which you will get at the 
end of each lifetime - your preparation series. It's just 
a series of GPMS. The wildest most vicious GPMs I ever ran 
into. Practically everybody's got them at least twice. Carefully misdated. Carefully misdated. And every goal called a wrong
goal.
 
Audience: Mm-mm.
 
There's at least thirty or forty wrong dates on every one of 
the GPMS. And that's how they get you to return. Because 
between the wrong dates, they tell you to get out and come 
back here, see. That's how they freeze that in. I wondered 
how they made you feel all the time you're being dragged 
around and everything. I'm on the - I'm on the trail of that 
now. But that was - it's very elementary how they get you to 
return every time - they sandwich the command to return, between a series of about eighty GPMS, and somebody is going to come
up with the idea that he ought to, whatever other idea he
gets. But makes you think more and more that they're not
native to this galaxy, because this particular series does
not carry the significances. The goals are opposite-terminaled, yes. But the goals themselves are of a characteristic, as to 
make life the opposite terminal, so that livingness gives 
you the oppterm. This is very nice.
 
Goals are lovely: "To be wrong." "To get caught." You know, that sort of thing. All derogatory goals. So they make you 
of course be the opposite thing to this, see. So they naturally stay hung-up better. And then they're all misdated. So you
could produce this on a laboratory basis. Research basis,
see. You can produce too much charge as a research basis.
You could have this pc, pc is running with tone arm action,
pow-pow-pow pow-pow-pow-pow-pow-pow. Not let's - let me show
you now the ceilings you could go into. They're not all
wired for asbestos sound, and take unlimited amount of
bang. They can't. They're not like you, either. Because
they're still thinking that careful thought, man. See, and
you're going to put a little bit more charge on it, they're
not going to think that careful thought, they're just going
to go - thud. You're running a person who is awful close to
thud. Whether it's his individual tolerance or not we won't 
discuss.
 
But you can get TA action off this person, TA - you'll have 
this problem all the time as an auditor. I'm going to talk to -
about - I'm talking about one of the commonest problems you'll 
have, see? You get this person, they got - getting TA action, 
goes ping-ping-ping-ping-ping and it goes from 3.4 and 3.4 and
3.4 and 3.5 and 4.25 and 3.4 and 2.75 and it just - nice tone
arm action. You're - they're just sitting there talking. See,
they're just sitting there talking. And nobody's running
any process on them, so you say, "Well, that's fine, this
person gets good tone arm action. So therefore, we're going
to run the goal 'to forget.' " All right, so we run the
goal "to forget," and the tone arm action is from 3.5 to 4, with wide strikes. Now this is perfectly all right. But
watch it, man - watch it, man. All you've got to do is bypass
some charge, leave an item charged, mess it up, give it an
ARC break, be a little bit unskilled in auditing and - pow!
that discharges. Gone. There goes your TA action - gone! You
aren't going to get it back, either. Not without an awful
lot of work.
 
And now this person's jumpy. Person doesn't quite know what's 
going to happen to him. Something catastrophic has occurred. 
Don't you see? They're not getting results out of auditing. 
They don't think auditing is giving them the type of results, 
see. So your first indication that you are moving a case up 
to zenith on high-level processes, and if they're going to 
hit that point of tolerance and go right straight on through 
the sound barrier - bong! - the first point is a lessening TA
action. Now watch it, man. Because when the TA action
lessens, you are already running the case beyond tolerance.
Now I'm talking now about your Routine 2, Routine 3,
Routine 4 processes - which you haven't got yet - 4.
 
But, your - this is your skilled - this is your skilled
auditing level, you understand. Those - those are the things.
You watch that, you watch that diminishing tone arm.
Ordinarily you won't see it, because you don't study it
until after the session - or half the session goes by and you
suddenly realize that you know, this character was moving
from 3.0 to 4.25 yesterday and by George, this whole
session so far, the pc has only moved from 4.75 to 4.5 -
and see what's happened here.
 
Now, you're not in trouble - you're not in trouble. You can
go on. You see, your tolerance is pretty good. You can go
on. Only, watch it. Start auditing more carefully. Start
being very careful to keep that itsa line wide, wide, wide
open. And be very careful that the charge you do
restimulate is actually brought off the case. Start to
audit that case more delicately, don't you see. And don't
change to another type of auditing, don't restimulate
another single item, until you've gotten what you're doing
squared away.
 
Some cases are quite masochistic. They want to go earlier
and tear up the whole track. You've got a case that has
already had lessening tone arm action, and he wants to go
back on the backtrack and restimulate a whole chain of
goals. What do you do then? I'll just leave it up to you,
because man, you've opened up a whole chain of goals on
this character - you've opened up something new when you
haven't got something old finished off and you are now in
trouble. And many a pc will sit there on a very hard sell
and try to persuade you to do exactly that. And you can
just cut your throat, man! Understand, that that pc has had
diminishing tone arm action. You've already seen
diminishing tone arm action on the pc.
 
Now the pc's going to get ambitious and wants to tear up a
lot more charge. Oh, boy! That's the way you get your tone
arm stuck. Now, the way - the best way to keep from worrying
about a stuck tone arm is not to stick it. Now, that's
really the best way. Now, the next best way is notice it is
diminishing. And the moment you see it diminish, haul out
of there - as far as more restimulation is concerned. Let's
start getting - let's start getting thorough. See, we've
got a GPM. I'll show you one way to do this - we've got a GPM
and all of a sudden during that whole session that tone arm
has diminished.
 
I'll give you an example. We run the center goal out of the
Bear Implants. One of the centers. We've assessed for it on
3 - on R3R, and we run the center goal out of the Bear
Implants and we say, well, we've got that, we'll just run
the rest of that series of goals. So at that level of the
track, you assess. You list for the next goal to run. Yeah,
but you had good TA action, see. And your TA action
goes - gone. What happened? You restimulated the three or
four adjacent goals in that series of five goals, and you
now have four or five GPMs in restimulation and that amount
of charge has caused a cessation of tone arm action. See
this? So, that you can ordinarily trace back any ceased
tone arm action that has been moving to some additional
charge stirrer-upper - which then was in no way at all
handled. You say, well, you couldn't handle it.
 
Well, then the real subject of this lecture, which I should 
have given you earlier, but can be told to you in a very few 
inches of tape, is simply this: The problem - the puzzle - 
the mystery is the high tone arm. That's the whatsit line, 
you understand? The whatsit line or restimulation in general 
gives you the high or very low tone arm. But the common 
denominator, the overcharged case, the overcharged case, 
is always the whatsit line - even if life is putting in this 
whatsit or even if the pc is putting in this whatsit.
 
And the wrong thing to do is to get more whatsits on the case. 
Let me show you a totally wrong process. I don't care if it was
part of 2-12. I've just discovered this. This - to-absolutely
completely bassackwards wrong process, completely blyaww! -
is: "Tell me something you've been worried about." All you would have to do - all you would have to do is get one with 
a puzzle, a mystery, you know, a whatsit type item, you know,
whatsit item. You know, "What have you not understood in life?" That would be marvelous, see. That's a whatsit type item and 
have him just list whatsit type items. And the tone arm is 
going to go right on up there and it's eventually going to 
stick like crazy. Why? Because that's nothing but whatsits. 
Even though the pc is giving them, the pc is not given any
opportunity to do anything but concentrate on whatsits.
See, terribly elementary situation here.
 
If you wanted to cure that, you could have assessed it to a 
central or a reading whatsit or any of the whatsits on the 
list the pc seemed to be interested in, and just ask him "What solutions had he had for this." And that's your itsa. And
watch the tone arm start moving into action again.
 
"How many problems does this solve?" would be a totally incorrect auditing question. That's absolutely backwards. That'll just
park a tone arm. Now let's get it right way to. "How many
solutions are there, have you had. let's not dream them up
or invent them - "How many solutions have you had to this
problem?" That's totally correct. Because the pc is where
he is, because everything has cured everything. I have an
index someplace or another, done in 1958, I ought to bring
this to you, I have to give you another lecture on it next
week. But the cures are the cures are the cures are the
cures. It even goes into matter, energy, space and time,
how each one is the cure for the next one. Cure, cure,
cure, cure, cure. That's what gives you the itsas. The itsa
line then goes in. See?
 

 
